How Many Repulican Senators Where There When Nixon Went to China
Nixon Wins Broad Approval of Relation on Taiwan Talks but Some Unfavorable judgment Arises
See the article in its original context from
Feb 29, 1972
,
Page
17Buy out Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home delivery and digital subscribers.
About the File away
This is a digitized variant of an article from The Multiplication's mark file away, before the start of online publication in 1996. To keep these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continued to work to improve these archived versions.
WASHINGTON, Feb. 28—President of the United States Nixon won general Congressional blessing now for his China enterprise but encountered some criticism along his conservative Republican flank as well Eastern Samoa from two Democratic Presidential candidates for his pledge of piecemeal troop withdrawal from Taiwan.
From the initial Congressional response, IT was apparent that the President, home from his China activate, would find broad two-party support for his go toward closer relations with Peking.
But it also appeared that Mr. Nixon faced opposition from his conservative following also equally about partisan critique from Democratic Presidential candidates if he did not apace progress to clear that the U.S.A was dead by its defense commitments to the Chinese Nationalist Government connected China.
Amid the praise for the President from such Senators as Mike Mansfield, the majority leader. Hugh Scott, the Republican drawing card, and Edward M. Kennedy, there were grumblings, still mostly private, among conservative Republicans that the President, in the interest of seeking an adjustment with the Peking Government, was abandoning the Government of Chairperson Chiang Kai‐shek.
Humphrey Is Critical
A related line of criticism came from the other side of the political fence, from Senator Hubert H. Humphrey and Senator Henry M. Mahalia Jackson, both of whom suggested that most of the concessions had been made past the United States, and fewer by the Chinese leaders.
The Congressional reaction to the combined communiqué issued at the conclusion of the President's visit to Red China was restrained, with none of the outpouring of statements that usually accompanies a major Presidential strike operating theater speech.
In part with, the sparseness of reaction appeared attributable to the fact that it was Monday and many members, such as Senator J. W. Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Exotic Dealings Committee, were unconscious of town. In part, it could also atomic number 4 explained past the fact President Nixon and much of his senior staff were off and thus on that point, was no sign of the usual White House orchestration and organization of Congressional reaction.
It also appeared that many members were surprised at how far Mr. Nixon had spent, issue, ticularly on the Taiwan issue, and were reluctant to speak unsuccessful until they knew more or so the discussions with the Chinese leaders. Congressional leaders bequeath personify briefed tomorrow at the White House on the President's trip.
Conservatives Are Cautious
This reluctance was pronounced among the Republican conservatives, who were ill over the communique's reference to the graduated decrease of American forces along Taiwan simply still loath to express themselves in a mode that could be construed as criticism of the President.
Among the conservatives, Senator James L. Buckley of New York State was almost alone in speaking out in a critical tonus. Senator Buckley called a newsworthiness league to voice concern that the communique was "being wide interpreted both at home plate and abroad as signal the crowning abandonment of Taiwan aside the United States of America."
Contending that the US interactive defense treaty with Taiwan was "regarded in Asia as the litmus test quiz of U.S. resolve," Senator Buckley aforementioned: "If we permit doubts about our intentions to persist with respect to our security arrangement with Taiwan, we will undercut the credibleness of our arrangements with Nihon, South Dae-Han-Min-Gook and our other Asian Allies Eastern Samoa well."
Illustrative of the cautious, even desperate reaction of the conservatives was Senator Peter H. Dominick, Republican of Colorado, who is unremarkably one of the more outspoken champions of the Taipei Regime just who declined through an auxiliary to make any immediate gossip until "we potty determine what IT all agency."
Privately, some of the conservatives clung to a hope that the Chairperson had wrung some unannounced concessions from the Chinese leaders in return for his pledge of troop withdrawals from Taiwan.
'Clarification' Awaited
"The President is likewise good horse trader to give way Taiwan without something in exchange," said peerless conservative Republican Senator who re quested that he non be known. "Thus, I remember there must be some arrangements we are not aware of."
Senator John Column, Republican River of Texas, some other supporter of the Chinese Nationalist Regime, said the Chief Executive's statement on Taiwan "is subject to interpretation and requires considerable clarification."
Without directly referring to the Taiwan issue, Senator Lloyd M. Bentsen Jr., Democrat of Texas, aforementioned: "If the communique is the complete resultant role, then am disappointed that Mr. Richard Nixon was not a tougher trader. Soh far the major concessions seem to have been made past our lateral."
Middling the same objections were upraised by Senators Michael Jackson and Humphrey as they campaigned in Florida for the Democratic Presidential nomination.
Commenting that he was "rather saddened" aside the communique, Senator Jackson said, "It's bad when you go to the meridian when you are running for the Presidential term and anxious to get any agreement."
"It appears that we are doing the withdrawing and they are doing the staying," he aforesaid.
"That does not strike Maine as slap-up horse trading."
Other Democrats Proud of
Senator Humphrey issued a statement saying: "Information technology is apparent from the communique as I read IT that concessions were made past the President and past Dr. Kissinger, but non any, to that extent A I have been able to interpret, were made by the Chinese."
The Jackson and Humphrey criticisms, however, were not reflective of the general Democratic chemical reaction in Congress.
Senator Kennedy, who commonly has few words of kudos for the Nixon Administration, delineated the communique as "one of the most progressive documents" in the history of American language diplomacy and said: "The bridge that has now been built to Peking leave be a lasting monument to the Presidential term of Richard Milhous Nixon."
Expressing surprise at Mr. Humphrey's chemical reaction, Senator George McGovern, campaigning in Texas, same He wholeheartedly approved the communique enactment on Taiwan and said he would have gone further by agreeing to draw out all United States troops within terzetto years.
"We throw nothing to gain," he said. "This is a doubtfulness to be solved betwixt China and Taiwan."
How Many Repulican Senators Where There When Nixon Went to China
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1972/02/29/archives/nixon-wins-broad-approval-of-congress-on-china-talks-but-some.html
0 Response to "How Many Repulican Senators Where There When Nixon Went to China"
Post a Comment